{"id":11806,"date":"2019-07-12T12:00:53","date_gmt":"2019-07-12T09:00:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/modecon.mnau.edu.ua\/?p=11806"},"modified":"2019-07-15T13:41:11","modified_gmt":"2019-07-15T10:41:11","slug":"valuing-agricultural-enterprise-for-investment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/modecon.mnau.edu.ua\/en\/valuing-agricultural-enterprise-for-investment\/","title":{"rendered":"Sivitska Y., Valuing Agricultural Enterprise for Investment Purposes: Methodological Aspect"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n\n\n\n
JEL<\/strong> Classification:<\/strong> G320, Q14, M20.<\/td>\nDOI<\/b>: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31521\/modecon.V15(2019)-25<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

Sivitska Yuliia<\/strong>, PhD student, Department of Economics and Management, Poltava state agrarian academy, Poltava, Ukraine<\/p>\n

ORCID ID<\/strong>: 0000-0001-8635-9038<\/a>
\ne-mail<\/strong>: ijosjo@ukr.net<\/a><\/p>\n

Valuing Agricultural Enterprise for Investment Purposes: Methodological Aspect<\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Abstract<\/strong>. Introduction. The production cycle of agricultural enterprises and agribusiness management differs significantly from other sectors. Scientists emphasize significant differences of agrarian sphere from other ones, strong dependence on unpredictable weather changes inherent in it. Also, there is an increased risk of income instability, volatility of agricultural markets and variety of activities that can be conducted in one enterprise. Along with the presence of many risk factors, this area is also characterized by high profitability and it is always attractive to investors. Consequently, there is a need to improve the methodology of agricultural business valuation and the search for the most correct method and methodological approach to determine the value of agricultural business for investment purposes.<\/p>\n

Purpose<\/strong>. The purpose of the study is to determine which of the methods of business valuation is the most suitable for objective agricultural business valuation for investment purposes.<\/p>\n

Conclusions<\/strong>. The novelty of the article is it proves that a Build-up approach is appropriate for discount rate calculation (in agricultural business valuation for investment purposes). And justification of the fact that Cost of equity capital model (cash flow discounting-based method of business valuation) is acceptable for agrarian business valuation was further developed. As this model provides the most objective information for investors and business owners and is most often used by professionals for valuing a business when investment decisions are necessary. The results show that Income approach, Cash flow discounting method (Cash flow type – Equity cash flow) is the correct methodology for valuing agricultural business for investment purposes.<\/p>\n

Keywords<\/strong>: agricultural enterprise valuation, specific company risk premium, cost of equity capital, capital assets pricing model, Build-up method, business valuation, discount rate.<\/p>\n

References:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Marques-Perez, I., Guaita-Pradas, I. & P\u00e9rez-Salas, J. L. (2017). Discounting in agro-industrial complex. A methodological proposal for risk premium. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research<\/em>, 15, 1, 1-15. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5424\/sjar\/2017151-10225.<\/li>\n
  2. Stasytyt\u0117, V. & Du\u017einskyt\u0117, V. (2016). Agriculture Sector Risk Management. Future of Lithuania<\/em>, 8, 2, 200\u2013211. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.3846\/mla.2015.901.<\/li>\n
  3. Santeramo, F.G., Capitanio, F. & Adinolfi, F. (2014). Integrating Agricultural Risks Management Strategies in Selected EU Partner Countries: Syria, Tunisia, Turkey. Romanian Journal of European Affairs<\/em>, 14, 3, 22-35. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.2491415.<\/li>\n
  4. Schaffnit-Chatterjee, C. (2010). Risk management in agriculture: towards market solutions in the EU. Deutche bank research, September, pp.1-31.<\/li>\n
  5. Clapp, J. & Martin S. (2015). Finance for Agriculture or Agriculture of Finance? Journal of Agrarian Change<\/em>, 15, 549\u2013559. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/joac.12110.<\/li>\n
  6. Schneider, L. (2010). Risk and risk transfer in agriculture: facilitating food security and poor farmer participation. Oxfam America. pp. 1-42.<\/li>\n
  7. Franc-D\u0105browska, J., Madra-Sawicka M. & Bere\u017cnicka, J. (2018). Cost of Agricultural Business Equity Capital\u2014A Theoretical and Empirical Study for Poland. Economies<\/em>, 6, 37, 10, 1-15. doi:10.3390\/economies6030037.<\/li>\n
  8. Chawla, G. K. (2014). Estimating cost of capital in today\u2019s economic environment. Journal of Business and Behavior Sciences,<\/em> 26, 102\u2013111.<\/li>\n
  9. Meinhart, T.J. (2008). Estimating a Company-Specific Risk Premium in the Cost of Capital for Ad Valorem Tax Valuation Purposes. Willamette Management Associates Insights<\/em>, Summer 2008, pp. 19-25.<\/li>\n
  10. C\u00e2mara, A., San-Lin, C. & Yaw-Huei, W. (2008). Option implied cost of equity and its properties. Journal of Future Markets<\/em>, 29, 599\u2013629. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.1003924<\/li>\n
  11. Habib, A. (2005). Information risk and the cost of capital: Review of the Empirical Literature. Journal of Accounting Literature<\/em>, 25, 127\u2013168. doi: 2139\/ssrn.722781.<\/li>\n
  12. Hall, R., Kaveski D.S., Nelson I. & Nelson H. (2014). Analysis of the debt and impact on cost of debt and profitability of companies listed on Brazilian agribusiness Bm&FBovespa. Custos e Agronegocio<\/em>, 10, 39-59.<\/li>\n
  13. Szekely, C. & Palinkas, P. (2009). Agricultural risk management in the European Union and in the USA, Studies in Agricultural Economics, <\/em>109, 55\u201372.<\/li>\n
  14. Vidal Garc\u00eda, R., Sales, C. & Lopez, L., (2004), Company valuation methods: applying dynamic analogical-stock market valuation models to agrarian co-operatives. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 2, 1, 17-25. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.5424\/sjar\/2004021-56<\/li>\n
  15. Dzuri\u02c7ckov\u00e1, J., Fabinyov\u00e1 R. & Mihal\u02c7cov\u00e1, B. (2015). The opportunity cost of equity capital. Procedia Economics and Finance,<\/em> 23, 1492\u20131498. doi: http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/S2212-5671(15)00462-1<\/li>\n
  16. Mohendroo, M. (2014). Some common mistakes to avoid in estimating and applying discount rates. A Middle East Point of View<\/em>, Spring 2014, pp.37-43.<\/li>\n
  17. Fernandez, P. (2004). Company Valuation Methods: The Most Common Errors in Valuations. Working Paper \u2116 449. IESE.<\/li>\n
  18. Orsinger, R.R. (2012). Business Valuation Upon Divorce: How Theory and Practice Can Lead to Problems In Court. AICPA\/AAML. Conference on divorce, May 10-12, 2012. Las Vegas, NV (USA). pp. 1-102.<\/li>\n
  19. Damodaran, A. (2009). Equity risk premiums (ERP): Determinants, estimation and implications. A post-crisis update. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments,<\/em> 18, 5, 289-370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1468-0416.2009.00151.x<\/li>\n
  20. Rutkowska-Ziarko, A. & Pyke, C. (2017). The development of downside accounting beta as a measure of risk. Economics and Business Review<\/em>, 3, 17, 55-65. doi<\/em>: 18559<\/em>\/<\/em>ebr<\/em>.<\/em>2017.4.4<\/em>.<\/em><\/li>\n
  21. Highland Global. Strategy and Finance, (2015). The specific company risk premium. New Approach. Value Highlights<\/em>, pp.1-10.<\/li>\n
  22. Butler, J.P. & Pinkerton, A.K. (2008). The Butler Pinkerton Model: Empirical Support for Company-specific Risk. The Value Examiner<\/em>, May \/ June 2008, pp. 32-39.<\/li>\n
  23. Mercer, Z.C. (1989). The Adjusted Capital Asset Pricing Model For Developing Capitalization Rates: An Extension Of Previous \u201cBuild-Up\u201d Methodologies Based Upon The Capital Asset Pricing Model. Business Valuation Review<\/em>, 8,4,147-156. https:\/\/bvreview.org\/doi\/abs\/10.5791\/0882-2875-8.4.147<\/li>\n
  24. Shepeleva, A. (2015). Evaluation Of a Company Specific Risk Premium On Emerging markets: A New Approach. Journal of Finance and Credit<\/em>, 26, 698, 41-54.<\/li>\n
  25. Okulov, V.L. (2017). Investment Decisions under Uncertainty: Risk Management Approach. Vestnik SPbGU. Management<\/em>, 16, 2, 191-214. doi: 10.21638\/11701\/spbu08.2017.201.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Received:<\/strong> 30 May 2019<\/p>\n

    \"sukhomlyn.pdf\"<\/div>
    sukhomlyn.pdf<\/div><\/div>
    <\/div>
    <\/div>
    Size: <\/span>0.48 Mb<\/span><\/div>
    Download Now!<\/a><\/span>646<\/span> Downloads<\/span><\/span><\/div><\/div>
    <\/div>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
    \n

    How to quote this article?<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    Sivitska Y. (2019). Valuing Agricultural Enterprise for Investment Purposes: Methodological Aspect. Modern Economics<\/em>, 15(2019), 175-182. DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31521\/modecon.V15(2019)-25.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

    [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]<< Back to contents<\/a>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n

    <\/p>\n<\/section>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    [vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text] JEL Classification: G320, Q14, M20. DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31521\/modecon.V15(2019)-25 [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_column_text] Sivitska Yuliia, PhD student, Department of Economics and Management, Poltava state agrarian academy, Poltava, Ukraine ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8635-9038 e-mail: ijosjo@ukr.net Valuing Agricultural Enterprise for Investment Purposes: Methodological Aspect   Abstract. Introduction. The production cycle of agricultural enterprises and agribusiness management differs significantly from other sectors. Scientists
    Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[114],"tags":[115],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/modecon.mnau.edu.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11806"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/modecon.mnau.edu.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/modecon.mnau.edu.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/modecon.mnau.edu.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/modecon.mnau.edu.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11806"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/modecon.mnau.edu.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11806\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/modecon.mnau.edu.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11806"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/modecon.mnau.edu.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11806"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/modecon.mnau.edu.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11806"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}