Siska Widya, postgraduate student of the Faculty of Economics, Sriwijaya University, Palembang

ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5865-8436
e-mail: scholar2457@gmail.com

Adam Mohamad, Doctor of Financial Management, Faculty of Economics, Sriwijaya University, Palembang

ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5516-5345
e-mail: mr_adam88@unsri.ac.id

Isnurhadi, Doctor of Financial Management, Faculty of Economics, Sriwijaya University, Palembang

ORCID ID: 0000-0002-9978-9341
e-mail: isnurhadi@unsri.ac.id

Analysis of the Risk and Return of Bonds and Sukuk Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange

Abstract. Introduction. Financial market penetration in terms of both knowledge and accessibility has become more extensive and widespread as a result of economic globalization. This financial development was followed by an increase in funding demand on the financial market. Bonds and sukuk are two financial instruments that are very attractive to investors. Bonds are a type of debt activity agreement that is licensed through a debt certificate, whereas sukuk are certificates that have the same value and are evidence of ownership of a project or certain investment activities such as assets, benefit rights, and services.

Purpose. This research aims to identify and analyze the risks and returns of corporate bonds and sukuk listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, as well as to determine whether ROA influences the yield spreads of bonds and corporate sukuk listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange.

Results. The research demonstrates that the return on corporate sukuk is greater than the return on corporate bonds, the risk of corporate sukuk is greater than the risk of corporate bonds, there is a significant difference in return between bonds and corporate sukuk, there is a significant difference in risk between bonds and corporate sukuk, and the Return on Assets (High ROA) significantly decreases yield spreads on corporate bonds and sukuk.

Conclusions. The rate of return on corporate sukuk as calculated by Yield to Maturity (YTM) is greater than the rate of return on corporate bonds, while the level of risk of corporate sukuk as calculated by Value at Risk (VaR) is lower than the level of risk of corporate bonds. There is a significant difference in return when corporate sukuk and corporate bonds are measured by Yield To Maturity. High Value at Risk (VaR) and Return on Assets (ROA) indicate a large difference in risk between corporate sukuk and corporate bonds, which considerably reduces yield spreads on sukuk and corporate bonds.

Keywords: bonds; sukuk risk bonds; bond returns; risk sukuk; return sukuk.

References:

1. Abdelsalam, O., Elnahass, M., Ahmed, H., & Williams, J. (2022). Asset securitizations and bank stability: Evidence from different banking systems. Global Finance    Journal,   51, 100551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2020.100551 [in English].
2. Alam, N., Bhatti, M., & Wong, J. T. F. (2018). Assessing Sukuk Defaults Using Value-at-Risk Techniques. Managerial Finance, 44(6), 665–687. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-05-2018-0218 [in English].
3. Alswaidan, M. W. (2017). An Investigation of Sukuk Structure Risk. University of Portsmouth.
4. Anam, K., Maruddani, D. A. I., &Kartikasari, P. (2020). Pengukuran Value-atRisk pada PortofolioObligasiDenganMetode Varian-Kovarian. Jurnal Gaussian, 9(4), 434–443 [in English].
5. Ariff, M., Chazi, A., Safari, M., &Zarei, A. (2017). Significant Difference in the Yields of Sukuk Bonds versus Conventional Bonds. Journal of Emerging Market Finance. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972652717712352 [in English].
6. Ariff, Mohamed, & Safari, M. (2012). Are Sukuk Securities the Same as Conventional Bonds? Afro Eurasian Studies, 1(1), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1783551 [in English].
7. Asmuni, N. H., & Tan, K. S. (2020). Exploring the Yield Spread Between Sukuk and Conventional Bonds in Malaysia. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972652720969519 [in English].
8. Astuti, R. Y., &Fani, A. A. B. (2020). Risk and Return on Retail Sukuk and Retail Bond in Indonesia Period 2008-2017 (Comparative Study). AKSES: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan          Bisnis,      15(1),       32–44. https://doi.org/10.31942/akses.v15i1.3359 [in English].
9. Auronen, L. (2003). Asymmetric Information : Theory and Applications. 1–35. Balasubramnian, B., &Cyree, K. B. (2014). Has market discipline on banks improved after the Dodd-Frank Act? Journal of Banking and Finance, 41(1), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.01.021 [in English].
10. Balli, F., Ghassan, H., & Al, E. H. (2021). Sukuk and bond spreads. Journal of Economics and Finance, February. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-02109545-9 [in English].
11. Barqawi, O. A. B. (2018). The Risk of Sukuk ( Islamic bonds ) and Conventional Bonds : Comparative Study. Journal of Economic, Administrative and Legal Science, 2(3), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.26389/AJSRP. A281017 [in English].
12. Bhuiyan, R. A., Puspa, M., Saiti, B., & Ghani, G. M. (2020). Comparative analysis between global sukuk and bond indices: value-at-risk approach. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(6), 1245–1256. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-02-2018-0019 [in English].
13. Cakir, S., &Raei, F. (2007). Sukuk vs. Eurobonds: Is There a Difference in Value-at-Risk? IMF Working Paper, WP/07/237 [in English].
14. Cavallo, E. A., & Valenzuela, P. (2010). The determinants of corporate risk in emerging markets: An option-adjusted spread analysis. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 15(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.398 [in English].
15. Chermi, H., &Jerbi, Y. (2015). Sukuk as an Attractive Alternative of Funding and Investment in Tunisia. Journal of Emerging Economies and Islamic Research, 3(1), 1–22 [in English].
16. Copeland, T. E., Weston, J. F., & Shastri, K. (2005). Financial Theory and Corporate Theory (D. Clinton, D. Battisa, & D. Tokars (eds.); Fourth). Pearson Education, Inc. [in English].
17. Culp, C. L., & Neves, A. M. P. (1995). Value at Risk: Uses and Abuses. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 8(3), 121–1278 [in English].
18. Dewi, D. M., Nugroho, L., Sukmadilaga, C., &Fitijanti, T. (2020). Tinjauan Sukuk Korporasi di Indonesia dariPerspektifPenawaran , Permintaan dan Regulasi. Journal of Business and Economic Research, 1(1), 11–16 [in English].
19. Ericsson, J., & Renault, O. (2006). Liquidity and credit risk. The Journal Of Finance, LXI(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/13504860110061013 [in English].
20. Farrell, J., & Reinhart, W. J. (1997). Portfolio Management Theory and Application McGraw-Hill Series in Finance (second). Irwin McGraw-Hill [in English].
21. Fathurahman, H., &Fitriati, R. (2013). Comparative Analysis of Return on Sukuk and Conventional Bonds. American Journal of Economics, 3(3), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.economics.20130303.05 [in English].
22. Gebka, B., &Wohar, M. E. (2018). The predictive power of the yield spread for future economic expansions: Evidence from a new approach. Economic Modelling, 75(February),181–195 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.06.018 [in English].
23. Global Islamic Finance Report. (2019). Islamic Finance Country Index-IFCI 2019. In Global Islamic Finance Report 2019 [in English].
24. Godlewski, C. J., Turk-Ariss, R., & Weill, L. (2013). Sukuk vs. conventional bonds: A stock market perspective. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(3), 745–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2013.02.006 [in English].
25. Hamid, N. H. A., Zakaria, N. B., & Aziz, N. H. A. (2014). Firms’ Performance and Risk with the Presence of Sukuk Rating as Default Risk. Procedia – Social and Behavioral               Sciences, 145,         181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.06.025 [in English].
26. Hassan, K. A. (2013). Comparison between Sukuk and Conventional Bonds: Value at Risk Approach [University of Westminster]. In SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2215194 [in English].
27. Hendri, Z. (2018). Can Sukuk Become a Primadonna in Indonesia? Judging from the development of sukuk in several countries. Iqtishaduna: JurnalIlmiah Ekonomi Kita, 7(2), 168–179 [in English].
28. (2015). Islamic Finance : Opportunities, Challenges, and Policy Options. (2009). Staff Discussion Notes, 15(5), 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498325035.006 Investment, J. Annual Report [in English].
29. Jamaldeen, F. (2012). Islamic Finance for Dummies. John Wiley & Sons. Jubaidi. (2020). ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN TINGKAT PERMINTAAN OBLIGASI. Research Journal of Accounting and Business Management (RJABM), 4(2), 183–195 [in English].
30. Koch, M. (2015). Sukuk Vs Conventional Bonds : A study into the performance of Islamic Bonds. UnpublisheTesis [in English].
31. Liu, B., &Skully, M. (2005). The determinants of mortgage yield spread differentials: Securitization. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 15(4-5       ISS.),        314–333 [in English].
32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2005.04.003
33. Mardam-Bey, I. (2007). Sukuk, an emerging asset class. Siraj Capital.(Presentation). http://www.iefpedia.com/english/wpcontent/uploads/2009/10/SUKUK-an-Emerging-Asset-Class.pdf [in English].
34. Mohd Saad, N., Haniff, M. N., & Ali, N. (2020). Corporate governance mechanisms with conventional bonds and Sukuk’ yield spreads. Pacific Basin Finance Journal,   62(September         2018),      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.02.001 [in English].
35. Nanaeva, Z. K. (2010). How risky sukuk are: comparative analysis of risks associated with sukuk and conventional bonds. In British University in Dubai. The British University in Dubai.
36. Nanaeva, Z. K., & Pandey, D. D. (2010). How risky sukuk are: comparative analysis of risks associated with sukuk and conventional bonds. Faculty of Business, MSc in Fin(May), 63 [in English].
37. Nasir, A., & Farooq, U. (2017). Analysis of value at risk of Sukuk and conventional bonds in Pakistan. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 8(4), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-01-2014-0004 [in English].
38. Ni’mah, A., Laila, N., Rusmita, S. A., &Cahyono, E. F. (2020). Determinants of Corporate Bond and Sukuk Ratings in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Monetary and          Finance,   6(3), 689–712. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003049814-14 [in English].
39. Obligasi, S. D. A. N., &Ijtihadi, A. F. (2010). ANALISIS PENGUKURAN VALUE-AT-RISK PADA PORTOFOLIO. Tesis. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2020). Snapshot Perbankan Syariah Indonesia Juni       Otoritas   Jasa         Keuangan, 1–6. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/berita-dankegiatan/publikasi/Pages/Snapshot-Perbankan-Syariah-Juni-2020.aspx Pew Research Center. (2011). The future of the global Muslim population. Projections for 2010-2030. Population Space and Place, 13(1), 1–221 [in English].
40. Pirgaip, B., Arslan-Ayaydin, Ö., & Karan, M. B. (2021). Do Sukuk provide diversification benefits to conventional bond investors? Evidence from Turkey. Global Finance    Journal, 50(April),   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2020.100533 [in English].
41. Ramasamy, R., Munisamy, S., & Helmi, M. H. M. (2011). Relative Risk Of Islamic Sukuk Over Government And Conventional Bonds. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 11(6), 1–9 [in English].
42. Rodoni, A., & Setiawan, A. (2016). Risk and Return: Bonds and Sukuk in Indonesia. Al-Iqtishad: Journal of Islamic Economics, 8(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.15408/aiq.v8i2.3159
43. Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R., & Jaffe, J. (2010). Corporate Finance (B. Gordon (ed.); Nineth). McGraw-Hill Irwin [in English].
44. Saad, N. M., Haniff, M. N., & Ali, N. (2018). Long term conventional bonds versus long term sukuk issuances and their determinants in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Management, 2(2), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.26666/rmp.ijbm.2018.2.3 [in English].
45. Saeed, M., Elnahass, M., Izzeldin, M., &Tsionas, M. (2021). Yield spread determinants of sukuk and conventional bonds. Economic Modelling, 105(September), 105664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105664 [in English].
46. Shalhoob, H. . (2016). A Comparative Analysis of Risk-return Charaterics Between Sukuk (Islamic Bonds) and Conventional Bonds. Robert Gordon University [in English].
47. Tandelilin, E. (2017). Pasar Modal ManajemenPortofolio dan Investasi. PT. Kanisius.
48. Tariq, A. A., & Dar, H. (2007). Risks of Sukuk Structures: Implications for Resource Mobilization. Thunderbird International Business Review, 49(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie [in English].
49. Wilson, R. (2008). Islamic Capital Markets : The Role of Sukuk Incompatibility of Conventional Financial Market Instruments with Shariah Asset-Backed Sukuk. 1–4 [in English].