Maksymova I.I., PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of International Relations, State University of Economics and Technology, Kryvyi Rih; Postdoctoral Student at International Economics Department, West Ukrainian National University, Ukraine

ORCID ID: 0000-0001-9754-0414
e-mail: Maksimova_ii@kneu.dp.ua

Convergence of Digital and Climate-Neutral Economic Development: Evidence From Global Indices

Abstract. Introduction. The article examines the convergent aspects of global digital and green development on the way to building a global climate-neutral economy through the lens of global indices. Given the urgency of overcoming the climate challenge and achieving “net zero” emissions, the role of the digital transition in this process is shown.

Purpose. The purpose of the article is to analyze the general aspects of the convergence of green and digital development of the world economy based on the analysis of a number of global indices. The research aims to identify irregularities, lags and general patterns of the international movement towards a climate-neutral economy.

Results. The study is based on the analysis of global indices such as the Green Future Index, the Climate Change Index, the Energy Trilemma Index, the Global Digital Competitiveness Index, the Digital Economy and Society Index, and the Digital Quality of Life Index. This allows for a fairly comprehensive assessment of the development of green and digital currents in various countries of the world in view of the development of a climate-neutral economy. The obtained results show significant differences between countries and individual regions in the levels of digital and green development, in particular in the part of the energy transition. Countries with a high level of digital competitiveness are usually leaders in implementing green initiatives, confirming the synergy between digital transformation and environmental sustainability. At the same time, there is a significant gap between developed and developing countries in their progress towards climate neutrality, highlighting the need for additional targeted support, investment and international coordination.

Conclusions. The study showed the importance of integrating digital and green development to achieve climate neutrality. Countries that successfully combine these areas achieve greater success in reducing emissions, implementing innovations and increasing the sustainability of their economies. To overcome global disparities and accelerate progress, coordinated international efforts, increased financial support and increased technological potential are needed.

Keywords: global economy, climate neutrality; digital transformation; green growth global indicies; energy trilemma; green index; climate change index; Global Digital Competitiveness Index; Digital Economy and Society Index.

References:

1. Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
2. International Energy Agency. (2021). Net zero by 2050: A roadmap for the global energy sector. https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050.
3. (2020). Smart grid market by component, end-user, and region – global forecast to 2025. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/smart-grid-market-467.html.
4. European Environment Agency. (2022). Sustainable development in the European Union. https://www.eea.europa.eu/
5. Meckling, J., & Allan, B. (2020). The evolution of ideas in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 10, 434-438. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0739-7.
6. Pasimeni, F., Fiorini, A., & Georgakaki, A. (2021). International landscape of the inventive activity on climate change mitigation technologies. A patent analysis. Energy Strategy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESR.2021.100677.
7. Štreimikienė, D., Mikalauskienė, A., & Macijauskaitė-Daunaravičienė, U. (2022). Role of information management in implementing the Green Deal in the EU and the US. Journal of international studies, 15(4), 9-27.
8. Wróbel, I. (2024). The ‘green’agreement between the European Union and Japan. Stosunki Międzynarodowe–International Relations, 2, 24.
9. Iozzelli, L. (2018). Rethinking Authority in Global Climate Governance: How Transnational Climate Initiatives Relate to the International Climate Regime. Global Environmental Politics, 18, 158-160. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_r_00462.
10. Zhou, L., Zhou, C., Che, L., & Wang, B. (2020). Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of urban green development efficiency in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 30, 724 – 742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-020-1752-5.
11. McLaren, D., & Markusson, N. (2020). The co-evolution of technological promises, modelling, policies and climate change targets. Nature Climate Change, 10, 392-397. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0740-1.
12. MIT Technology Review. (2023). The green future index 2023. A ranking of 76 economies on their progress and commitment toward building a low-carbon future. https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/04/05/1070581/the-green-future-index-2023/
13. CCPI (2023). The Climate Change Performance Index 2024: Results. https://ccpi.org/
14. World energy council (2024) World Energy Trilemma 2024: Evolving with Resilience and Justice. World Energy Trilemma Report 2024 | World Energy Council
15. Hahn, R. W., & Metcalfe, R. D. (2021). Efficiency and equity impacts of energy subsidies. American Economic Review, 111(5), 1658-1688.
16. Panait, M., Janjua, L. R., Apostu, S. A., & Mihăescu, C. (2023). Impact factors to reduce carbon emissions. Evidences from Latin America. Kybernetes, 52(11), 5669-5686.
17. Singhal, K., Pawar, A., & Deedwania, S. (2021). Impact of Climate Change on Oil and Gas Sector and Mitigation Approach for Sustainable Development. Sustainable Climate Action and Water Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8237-0_19.
18. Alvi, S., Jamil, F., & Ahmed, A. (2021). Assessing the impact of global warming on productivity in emerging economies of Asia. International Journal of Global Warming. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijgw.2021.10039065.
19. Baumli, K., & Jamasb, T. (2020). Assessing private investment in African renewable energy infrastructure: A multi-criteria decision analysis approach. Sustainability, 12(22), 9425.
20. Michaelowa, A., Hoch, S., Weber, A. K., Kassaye, R., & Hailu, T. (2021). Mobilising private climate finance for sustainable energy access and climate change mitigation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Climate Policy, 21(1), 47-62.
21. IMD World Competitiveness Center. (2023). IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking 2023. IMD Business School. https://www.imd.org/research-knowledge/reports/world-digital-competitiveness-ranking-2023/
22. European Commission. (2022). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2022. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/digital-economy-and-society-index-desi-2022
23. Pashchenko, D. S. (2023). Early Formalization of AI-tools Usage in Software Engineering in Europe: Study of 2023. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science.
24. Maksymova, I. (2023). Digitalization-based integration of climate policies of Ukraine and the EU.
25. Firoiu, D., Pîrvu, R., Jianu, E., Cismas, L. M., & Tudor, S. (2022). Lat, ea, G. Digital Performance in EU Member States in the Context of the Transition to a Climate Neutral Economy. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3343.
26. (2023). Digital Quality of Life Index 2023. https://surfshark.com/dql2023
27. Lee, M. J., & Roh, T. (2023). Digitalization capability and sustainable performance in emerging markets: mediating roles of in/out-bound open innovation and coopetition strategy. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2022-1398