Hrushchynska Natalia, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Professor of the Department of International Economic Relations, Business and Tourism, State Noncommercial Company «State University «Kyiv Aviation Institute», Kyiv, Ukraine

ORCID ID: 0000-0002-5606-4666
e-mail: gruschinska@gmail.com

Economic Diplomacy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Abstract. Introduction. The article analyzes the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on modern economic diplomacy, which is becoming a key factor in the global economy. The main objective is to explore the integration of AI into diplomatic processes, its influence on traditional approaches to interstate interaction, and the challenges posed by this technological breakthrough. The study aims to determine how AI-driven innovations can enhance economic competitiveness, improve data analysis, facilitate forecasting of international economic trends, and optimize negotiation strategies in global diplomacy.

Purpose. The research takes a multidisciplinary approach, combining qualitative and quantitative methods. A comparative analysis of the use of AI in economic diplomacy among major global players, including the US, China, and the EU, will be conducted. Case studies of AI-driven diplomatic initiatives will be examined to assess their effectiveness and impact. In addition, a content analysis of policy documents, international organization reports, and academic literature provides a comprehensive understanding of the transformative role of AI.

Results. The study identifies key trends in the integration of AI into economic diplomacy, highlighting its role in accelerating decision-making, predicting economic fluctuations, and mitigating international economic conflicts such as trade wars and sanctions. It examines AI applications in data-driven policymaking, automated negotiation support, and economic risk assessment. It also shows how AI contributes to real-time monitoring of economic indicators and improves the accuracy of strategic planning in foreign economic policy.

The article provides a novel perspective on the dual role of AI as both an opportunity and a challenge for economic diplomacy. It introduces a systematic framework for understanding the implications of AI-driven automation in diplomatic negotiations and its potential impact on global economic stability. The study also explores the ethical concerns associated with AI in diplomacy, including algorithmic biases, privacy risks, and disparities in access to advanced technologies among nations.

Conclusions. The findings underscore the need for international coordination in developing regulatory mechanisms for AI in economic diplomacy. Establishing ethical guidelines and governance frameworks will help mitigate risks while ensuring the equitable distribution of AI-driven economic benefits. The study highlights the importance of AI in promoting transparency, efficiency, and adaptability in diplomatic processes, while emphasizing the need for responsible implementation. The article serves as a valuable resource for policymakers, diplomats, and international organizations seeking to harness the potential of AI while addressing its inherent challenges in economic diplomacy.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; economic diplomacy; foreign policy; geoeconomics; technological development.

References:

1. Bezverkha, I. A. (2015). Commercial Diplomacy at Modern Stage of Development: Main Trends and Factors. Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanitarian University, 10, 36-39. http://www.vestnik-econom.mgu.od.ua/journal/2015/10-2015/08.pdf.
2. Vergun, V. A. (2008). Economic diplomacy in the system of factors of international competitiveness of Ukraine. Current problems of international relations, 74(1), 150-154. 
3. Horbachuk, O. I., Rokocha, V. V. (2019). The place of economic diplomacy in the system of economic security of the state. Academic notes of the University “KROK”, 2(54), 110-118. https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2019-53-110-118.
4. Hrushchynska, N. M. (2016). Economic diplomacy as a powerful tool for overcoming the country’s conflict-proneness. Nobel Prize in Economics Bulletin, 1(9), 85-90.
5. Hrushchynska, N. M. (2017). Implementation of economic diplomacy in the system of modern international relations: the potential for creativity and traditional approaches. Scientific Bulletin of the Diplomatic Academy of Ukraine, 24(3), 86-92. 
6. Didukh, V. (2023, November 29). Ukraine’s economic diplomacy during the war. [Conference presentation abstract]. III International Bohdan Hawrylyshyn Scientific Readings, ZUNU, Ternopil, Ukraine. 
7. Zosymenko, T. (2021, January 21). How does Ukrainian economic diplomacy work and where does it falter in relations with neighbors? Ukrainian Prism. http://prismua.org/economicdiplomacy/. 
8. Kukharyk, V. V., & Roshko, I. (2021, May 17). Economic diplomacy as a tool for ensuring national interests. [Conference presentation abstract]. All-Ukrainian scientific and practical Internet conference Transformation of foreign economic models of countries in the context of global destabilization of regional markets,  Vezha-Druk, Lutsk, Ukraine. 53-59. 
9. Roshko, I., & Kukharyk, V. (2021). Economic diplomacy as a tool for realizing national interests. International relations, public communications and regional studies, 2(10), 221-232. https://relint.vnu.edu.ua/index.php/relint/article/view/229/201. 
10. Nyzhnyk, V. (2007). Ekonomichna dyplomatiia ta ekonomichna bezpeka Ukrainy. KhNU. 
11. Petryshyn, O. O., Marhita, M. Ye., & Yefriemova, K. V. (2023). Economic diplomacy and its role in ensuring the economic security of Ukraine. Legal scientific electronic journal, 4, 113-117. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2023-4/25.
12. Rudnieva, O. M., Holovashchenko, O. S., Zhuk, N. A., & Shevchuk, M. O. (2024). Economic diplomacy as a means of ensuring national interests. Legal scientific electronic journal, 6, 60-63. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2024-6/13.
13. Tatarenko, N. O., Prokopieva, A. A., Nabok, I. I, & Pobochenko, L. M. (2023). Modern diplomatic relations between Ukraine and Japan: cross-cultural and economic aspects. Efficient economy, 3. http://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105.2023.3.38.  
14. Bureiko, N. (Ed.). (2023). Ukrainska pryzma: Zovnishnia polityka 2022. Analitychne doslidzhennia. TOV «Vistka». http://prismua.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/UPFP-23-UKR_WEB.pdf. 
15. Fedotova, Y. V. (2019). Economic diplomacy in the system of modern international relations. State and regions. Series: Economy and Entrepreneurship, 3(108), 16-19. http://www.econom.stateandregions.zp.ua/journal/2019/3_2019/5.pdf.
16. Flissak, K. (2020). Economic Diplomacy in Countering Challenges to Ukraine’s National Interests. Journal of European Economics, 19(2), 410-412. https://jeej.wunu.edu.ua/index.php/ukjee/article/view/1460.
17. Chuhaienko, Y. O. (2013). Economic diplomacy in the system of management of foreign economic activity of the state. Current problems of economics, 3(141), 59-69. 
18. Sharov, O. M. (2019). Ekonomichna dyplomatiia: osnovy, problemy ta perspektyvy. Natsionalnyi instytut stratehichnykh doslidzhen. 
19. Damoc Adrian-Ioan. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Economic Diplomacy: Using Unsupervised Machine Learning to Identify Key Geostrategic Partners in ASEAN for the European Union. Revista OEconomica, 1-2. https://oeconomica.org.ro/abstract/611/Artificial-Intelligence-in-Economic-Diplomacy-Using-Unsupervised-Machine.html.
20. Вonzanini, O. A., Menuzzi Diverio, T. S., Da SilvaL, Z., & Olesiak, E. M. (2018). Economic Development and Dependence Theory: The Approach of the Un Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, 1. https://sciendo.com/article/10.29316/ers-seir.2018.02.
21. Hajdari-Hajra, F., & Binaku A. (2021). Assessment of Selected Municipalities’ Performance of Citizen-Centric Investment Planning, and Support for Youth Programming in Kosovo. SEEU Review, 16(2), 87-103. DOI:10.2478/seeur-2021-0030.