Vinichenko Ihor, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Economic, Dnipro State Agrarian and Economic University, Dnipro, Ukraine

ORCID: 0000-0002-9527-1625
e-mail: igorvinichenko@i.ua

Trusova Anastasiia, Assistant of the Department of Economics and Business, Dmytro Motornyi Tavria State Agrotechnological University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine

ORCID: 0009-0008-8154-2456
e-mail: anastasia.tru030@gmail.com

Formation of anti-crisis potential for economic development of agricultural enterprises

Abstract. Introduction. This article examines the conditions for forming the anti-crisis potential of agricultural enterprises’ economic development. It considers the theoretical provisions for restoring the anti-crisis potential of agricultural enterprises’ economic development under martial law and macroeconomic instability. The economic essence of anti-crisis potential as an integrative category that characterizes agricultural enterprises’ ability to ensure anti-crisis stability, production continuity, and investment activity in crisis conditions is substantiated.

Purpose. The study aims to establish a scientific approach to developing the anti-crisis potential of agricultural enterprises, ensuring adaptive stability in the face of macroeconomic instability, military risks, disrupted logistics chains, inflation, and changing agricultural markets.

Results. The formation and restoration of anti-crisis potential is determined to be a multi-component process. This process includes financial, resource-production, energy-technological, export-logistics, investment-innovation, and coordination components. The interaction of these components forms the systemic adaptation of agricultural business entities to macroeconomic instability in the country. The study analyzes the impact of destabilizing factors, such as inflation, production losses, logistical disruptions, military risks, price volatility, and rising energy costs, on the anti-crisis resilience level of Ukrainian agricultural enterprises. The study proves that the combined effect of macroeconomic and military factors decreases the liquidity, profitability, and investment capacity of enterprises while stimulating changes in their economic behavior and adaptation strategies.

Conclusions. The integration of a set of tools into a single anti-crisis coordination system for the economic development of agricultural enterprises ensures the restoration of production potential, stabilization of cash flows, and long-term investment orientation. The strategic directions of the enterprises’ economic development are determined based on an adaptive anti-crisis potential model focused on increasing resource efficiency, technological modernization, activating investments, and reducing the risks of economic activity in the context of the agricultural sector crisis. 

Keywords: anti-crisis potential; economic development; agricultural enterprises; adaptive resilience; liquidity; profitability; investment capacity; macroeconomic instability; military risks; logistics chains; price volatility; inflationary processes; transformation of agricultural markets.

References:

1. Kirsanova, V.V., Samsonova, V.O. (2025). Financial diagnostics under martial law. Economics: realities of the time. Scientific journal, 1(77), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.15276/ETR.01.2025.4.
2. Kozlovsky, D. (2022). Anti-crisis challenges of the agricultural sector of Ukraine. Economics of the Agricultural Industry, 5, 15-27. https://doi.org/10.30838/EP.199.207-213.
3. Lunkina, I.Yu. (2024). Theoretical aspects of anti-crisis management of an enterprise in conditions of turbulence of the external environment. Business-Inform, 1, 22-28. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2024-1-22-28.
4. Mykolenko, I.G., Stylik, A.G., Rozhko, L.Yu. (2021). The role of strategy in ensuring the economic security of an agricultural enterprise. Current problems of innovative economics and law, 2, 43-49. https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2021-2-8.
5. Nechaeva, I.A., Shitikova, L.V. (2020). Innovations as a key economic tool for anti-crisis development of enterprises. Scientific Bulletin of KhNEU, 4, 60-72. https://doi.org/10.35546/kntu2078-44.
6. Petrenko, O., Shevchenko, A. (2024). Adaptation of agricultural production to wartime realities: preservation of economic security of Ukraine. Galician economic journal, 88(3), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.33108/galicianvisnyk_tntu2024.03.020.
7. Sharanov, R.S. (2023). The mechanism of anti-crisis management of the enterprise and its architecture. Scientific Bulletin of the Poltava University of Economics and Trade, 1(107), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.37734/2409-6873-2023-1-5.
8. Anugrah, H.P., Sutrisno, J., Marwanti, S., Nadifta, A.U., Indah, N. (2023). Analysis of Rice Supply Chain Management Related to Performance and Sustainability of Food Security Program in Central Java. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(3), 525-536. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujar.2023.110303.
9. Christopher, M., Peck, H. (2004). Building Resilient Supply Chains. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090410700275. 
10. FAO. (2023). The State of Food and Agriculture 2023 – Revealing the true cost of food to transform agrifood systems. Rome. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/5aac5078-625d-4b94-b964-bea40493016c/content.
11. OECD/FAO (2021). Building Agricultural Resilience to Natural Hazard-induced Disasters: Insights from Country Case Studies. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2021/06/building-agricultural-resilience-to-natural-hazard-induced-disasters_ce136a95/49eefdd7-en.pdf.
12. Selvaggi, R., Rizzo, G., Sharma, J. (2023). Research on sustainable development of agricultural product cold chain logistics under public safety emergencies. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1174221.
13. Tang, C. S. (2005). Perspectives in Supply Chain Risk Management and Price Flexibility in Agricultural Markets. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 451-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.12.006.
14. Trusova, N.V., Hryvkivska, O.V., Kotvytska, N.M., Nesterenko, S.A., Yavorska, T.I., Kotyk, O.V. (2021). Determinants of the innovative and investment development of agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Extension, 8, 81-100. https://doi.org/10.33687/ijae.009.00.3724.
15. Trusova, N.V., Polishchuk, N.V., Sakun, A.G., Prystеmskyi, O.S., Morozov, R.V. (2021). Anti-Crisis Stability of Break-Even Development Potential and its Resource Support in Agribusiness. Scientific Horizons, 24(6), 62-80. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor.24(6).2021.62-80.
16. Trusova, N., Zakharova, N., Lysenko, A., Kohut, I. (2022). Risk-orientated management in the sustainable economic system of united agricultural enterprises. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilità, 2, 347-372. https://doi.org/RePEc:fan:rissri:v:html10.3280/riss2022–002020.
17. Vinichenko, I.I., Trusova, N.V., Kalchenko, S.V., Pavlenko, O.S., Vasilev, S.V., Holovko, R.A. (2021). Ensuring protection of the competitiveness of farms in the modified macro and micro environment of the multifactor risk. Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 39(6), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i6.5113.
18. World Bank. (2024). Ukraine Agriculture Recovery and Resilience Support Strategy. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099062524074615884/pdf/P1801981319afe091b8b71b33b7a901d4e.pdf.