Diuk Anna, PhD (Economics), Department of Еconomics, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine

ORCID ID: 0000-0001-6480-0558
e-mail: annaduke@ukr.net

Motivational Bases for the Development of Social Entrepreneurship in Rural

Abstract. Introduction. The article describes the motivational foundations of rural social enterprise development. The priority role of social entrepreneurship as a basic mechanism for replacing state socio-economic functions in the system of solving rural development problems is substantiated. The priority of the socially oriented mode of production in agriculture over the capitalist has been theoretically proved.

The purpose. The statuses of social entrepreneurship are defined by functions and results that apply to the criteria for achieving sustainable development of rural areas. A methodological comparative assessment of the functions of social entrepreneurship and socially responsible entrepreneurship is carried out. Theoretical aspects of socialization of agricultural business activity in the context of realization of access of market subjects to jobs, goods are revealed.

Results. The criteria of accessibility of the results of business management as an indicative factor of the level of social welfare of the peasants have been determined.

Conclusions. The organizational conformity of the status of social entrepreneurship of economic and social functions of production enterprises, which are realized through the mechanism of social responsibility, has been proved. The motivational meanings of the spread of social entrepreneurship are identified and the strategic steps of motivational support for its development in rural areas are suggested. The correspondence of the steps of spreading social entrepreneurship to the possible scenarios of its spread is marked. The long period of socio-economic stagnation of the rural sector of the economy, despite some successes in the production sphere, contributes to the deepening of the destructive development of the village. This year there are additional problems that will need to be addressed in the entrepreneurial, social and labor fields. There is a real need to support the expansion of entrepreneurial systems that fulfill a social mission in the countryside.

Keywords: social entrepreneurship; socialization; motivation; village; agricultural activities; rural area.

References:

1. Bornshtein, D. (2012). Kak yzmenyt myr: Sotsyalnoe predprynymatelstvo y syla novikh ydei. Per. s anhl. M. Alpyna Pablysher. 499 p. [in Russian].
2. Davydovska, H. I. (2016). Problems of social entrepreneurship in Ukraine. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 7(1), 106-109 [in Ukrainian].
3. Zhuk, V. M. (2017). Obih zemel silskohospodarskoho pryznachennia za selozberihaiuchoiu modelliu ahrarnoho ustroiu Ukrainy. Kyiv: Natsionalnyi naukovyi tsentr «Instytut ahrarnoi ekonomiky» [in Ukrainian].
4. Kuts, M. R. (2015). Sotsialne pidpryiemnytstvo: osnovni idei ta perspektyvy doslidzhennia v sotsiolohii [Social entrepreneurship: basic ideas and perspectives of research in sociology]. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Sotsiolohichni nauky. 2015. T. 174. P. 51-55.
5. Malik, M. I. (1995). Motyvatsiia vyrobnychoi diialnosti v ahrarnii sferi ekonomiky. Metodolohiia i orhanizatsiia. K. : IAE. [in Ukrainian].
6. Popadynets, O. V. (2015). Sotsializatsiia ekonomiky yak nova paradyhma ekonomichnoi teorii. Visnyk ekonomiky transportu i promyslovosti, 49, 228-231 [in Ukrainian].
7. Popovych, D. V. & Baranova, M.-S.B. (2017). Social entrepreneurship as a promising tool for solving problems of modern society. Molodyi vchenyi, 5 (45), 701-705 [in Ukrainian].
8. Adam, S. (2018). Doslidzhennia pro pryrodu i prychyny bahatstva narodiv [Research on the nature and causes of the wealth of nations] / per. z anhl. O. Vasyliev, M. Mezhevikina, A. Malivskyi. K. : Nash format [in Ukrainian].
9. Sirenko, N. M. & Lunkina, T. I. (2016). Sotsialne pidpryiemnytstvo v Ukraini: osnovni aspekty. Stalyi rozvytok ekonomiky, 1, 5-10. [in Ukrainian].
10. Kharytonova, E. V. & Krylova, E.M. (2014). The socialization of entrepreneurship as a factor in the growth of national wealth. Sotsyalno-ekonomycheskye yavlenyia y protsessy, 9(5), 76-83.
11. Shpykuliak, O. H. (2006). Dynamics of social capital formation in the countryside. Ekonomika APK, 6, 140-148 [in Ukrainian].
12. Shpykuliak, O. H. (2017). Teoretychni zasady rozvytku pidpryiemnytstva v instytutsiinomu mekhanizmi rynku. Rozvytok malykh ahrarnykh pidpryiemstv v rynkovomu instytutsiinomu seredovyshchi: indykatory ta efektyvnist: monohrafiia. Kyiv. NNTs «IAE» [in Ukrainian].
13. Shumpeter, Y. A. (2011). Teoriia ekonomichnoho rozvytku [The theory of economic development]. K. : Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia [in Ukrainian].
14. Yunus, M. (2019). Myr trekh nulei. Kak spravytsia s nyshchetoi, bezrabotytsei y zahriaznenyem okruzhaiushchei sredi. Moskva. [in Russian].