Rulikova Nataliia, Candidate of Technical Sciences (Ph.D.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Intellectual Property and Project Management, National Metallurgical Academy of Ukraine, Dnipro, Ukraine

ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8383-8727
e-mail: djonatanrulikov@gmail.com

Myronenko Iryna, Candidate of Technical Sciences (Ph.D.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Intellectual Property and Project Management, National Metallurgical Academy of Ukraine, Dnipro, Ukraine

ORCID ID: 0000-0002-3012-4763
e-mail: i.drach.nmetau@gmail.com

Shvets Yevheniia, Senior Teacher of the Department of Intellectual Property and Project Management, National Metallurgical Academy of Ukraine, Dnipro, Ukraine

ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7396-6744
e-mail: belikovaevg@ukr.net

Project Management Features in the Innovative Development Processes of Competitive Industrial Enterprise

Abstract. Introduction. The works of many Ukrainian and foreign scientists is devoted to the issues of innovative development and approaches to managing the processes of its implementation. However, there is no single approach to assessing the efficiency of industrial enterprise innovation management in the face of volatile economic and political conditions in the country.

Purpose. The article reveals the theoretical bases of project management and innovation activities, approaches to the management of innovation activity in an industrial enterprise in order to increase its competitiveness and efficiency of the innovative technologies implementation. Approaches to assessing the level of innovative development are analyzed.

Results. It is suggested to evaluate the expediency of launching innovative programs of the enterprise taking into account the condition of its development. There are four basic indicators for determining the condition of enterprise development. The summary table illustrates how each of the indicators influences the identification of the condition of development. Particular attention is paid to the process of determining the value of the innovation indicator, in particular by assessing the levels of availability of intellectual property and human potential.

Conclusions. The authors concluded that the most appropriate tool for managing innovation activity would be to manage the innovation development program for a competitive industrial enterprise. This will allow the rational use of all available resources to achieve a higher level of efficiency from the implementation of innovative projects. However, further research is needed on the impact of the risk factor on the enterprise innovation development program and the screening tools for innovative projects proposed for inclusion in the program, taking into account the enterprise value system and the level of risk impact. It is also necessary to develop a software product that would use mathematical modeling to evaluate the feasibility of launching an innovative development program, taking into account the state of enterprise development.

Keywords: innovative activity; competitiveness; innovative project; project management; intellectual property; industrial enterprise.

References:

1. Zhu, X. & Xu, L. (2014). Evaluation of independent innovation capability of enterprises based on factor analysis. International Conference on Education Reform and Modern Management, 401-404. doi: https://doi.org/10.2991/ermm-14.2014.107.
2. José Eduardo de Oliveira Trindade, Maria Fatima Ludovico de Almeida, Ricardo Tanscheit & Marley M. B. R. Vellasco (2016). Assessment of innovative capacity of small and medium enterprises: a fuzzy-logic-based approach. International Association for Management of Technology Conference Proceedings, 1769-1779.
3. Koziol, L., Pyrek, R., Mikos, A. & Karas, A. (2015). Evaluation of the potential of innovative enterprises in the region of Malopolska. International Journal on Strategic Innovative Marketing, Vol. 02, 34-44. doi: 10.15556/ijsim.02.01.003.
4. Global Innovation Index. Web-site. Retrieved from https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/home.
5. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2012). About priority directs of innovative activity in Ukraine (Act № 3715-VI, December 5). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3715-17 [in Ukrainian].
6. Molodozhenia, M. S. (2016). Innovative projects of trade enterprises. Ekonomika Ukrainy, 4 (653), 92-103 [in Ukrainian].
7. Lepetiukha, N. V. & Lypska, A. S. (2018). The current state of innovative activity of industrial enterprises of Ukraine. Ekonomika i suspilstvo, 18, 150-158 [in Ukrainian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2018-18-21.
8. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2012). About innovative activity (Act №5460-VI, December 5). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/40-15 [in Ukrainian].
9. Mykytiuk, P. P. (Ed.). (2015). Innovative development of the enterprise. Ternopil: PP Prynter Inform [in Ukrainian].
10. Koliedina, K. O. (2018). Scientific and methodological approaches to the evaluation of innovative development of industrial enterprises. Molodyi vchenyi, 7 (59), 489-492 [in Ukrainian].
11. Shvets, Ye. S. & Rulikova, N. S. (2017). Mechanisms justification initiation program of innovative development of the enterprise and their documentary support. Visnyk Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu ‘Kharkivskyi politekhnichnyi instytut’, seriia ‘Stratehichne upravlinnia portfeliamy, prohramamy ta proektamy’, 2 (1224), 89-94 [in Ukrainian]. doi: 10.20998/2413-3000.2017.1224.15.
12. Shvets, Ye. S. & Rulikova, N. S. (2015). Features of the metallurgical enterprise reconstruction program. Tezy dopovidei ХІІ Mizhnarodnoi konferentsii ‘Upravlinnia proektamy u rozvytku suspilstva’ [Abstracts of Papers of the International Conference ‘Project Management in Society Development’], ХІІ Mizhnarodna konferentsiia ‘Upravlinnia proektamy u rozvytku suspilstva’ [ХІІ International Conference ‘Project Management in Society Development’]. Kyiv: KNUBA, 287- 289 [in Ukrainian].