Trusova Natalia, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Professor of the De-partment of Finance, Accounting and Taxation

ORCID ID: 0000-0001-9773-4534
e-mail: trusova_natalya5@ukr.net

Economic Dominance of Resource Opportunities of Hunting  Farms in the Environmental Policy of Ukraine

Abstract. Introduction. In the article the economic dominance of the resource opportunities of hunting grounds in the environmental policy of Ukraine is formed. The structural placement of hunt-ing grounds between the subjects of their use, the recreational value of which takes into account the hunting and plant origin in the countries of Europe and Ukraine, is presented.

Results. A methodical approach to the reproduction of hunting natural resources with a high level of environmental sustainability of natural capital in order to evaluate the effectiveness of its use in the practical activities of hunting farms on the basis of the existing environmental policy of the country, integrated in the space of public-private partnership is justified. A block diagram of the re-productive process and a matrix of impacts of the ecosystem of hunting farms on the resource poten-tial of natural capital have been constructed. The toolkit and the complex methodology of economic evaluation of the level of environmental sustainability of natural capital in the ecosystem of hunting farms are substantiated. The economic indicators of effective development of hunting farms in Ukraine are analyzed.

Conclusions. The ecological and economic effect of reproduction of natural resources of hunting in the countries of Europe and Ukraine was evaluated. The amount of budgetary investment costs for reproduction of resource potential of natural capital of hunting farms of Ukraine was deter-mined. The methodology of assessment of the level of security of ecological sustainability of the natu-ral capital of hunting farms under the influence of stimulating and inhibiting factors is proposed. The safety criteria of the ecological sustainability of the natural capital of the hunting farms of Ukraine are determined on the basis of the additive and multicative form of its manifestation.

Keywords: natural capital; hunting grounds; hunting farms; ecosystem; biomass; wildlife; medicinal herbs.

References:

1. Agriculture, forestry and fisheries. (2017-2021). http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/publ7_u.htm [in Ukraine].
2. Barreto, P., Souza, C, Nogueron, R., Anderson, A. & Salomao, R. (2006). Human Pressure and Protected Areas: Results and Discussion. Washington: DC World Resources Institute. [in English].
3. Deininger, K.. & Minten, B. (2002). Determinants of Deforestation and the Economics of Protection: An Application to Mexico. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(4), 943-960. [in English].
4. Dobrianska, L.O., Zharova, L.V. & Khlobystov, Ye.V. (2012). Strategicpotentialofecologicalsecurity: technologyofeconomicgrowth. Lviv: Ukrainian Bestseller. [in Ukraine].
5. Edwards, P. J. & Abivardi, C. (2009). The value of biodiversity: Where ecology and economy blend. Biological Conservation, 83(2), 239-246. [in English].
6. Ewers, R.M., & Rodrigues, A.S.L. (2008). Estimates of reserve effectiveness are confounded by leakage. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23(3), 13-6. [in English].
7. Jonsson, M. & Wardle, D.A. (2009). Structural equation modelling reveals plant-community drivers of carbon storage in boreal forest ecosystems. Biology Letters, 6(1), 1-4. [in English].
8. Hawken, P., Lovins, A. Lovins, H. (1999). Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution. New York: Little, Brown & Company. [in English].
9. Hsu, A., Johnson, L. & Lloyd, A. (2013). Measuring Progress: A Practical Guide from the Developers of the Environmental Performance Index. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy. [in English].
10. Hsu, A., Esty, D. C., de Sherbinin, A., & Levy, M. A. (2016). Environmental Performance Index: Global Metrics for the Environment. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy. [in English].
11. Kurttila, M., Pukkala, T., Loikkanen, J. (2002). The performance of alternative spatial objective types in forest planning calculations: a case for flying squirrel and moose. Forest Ecology and Management, 166(1-3), 245-260. [in English].
12. McCormick, J. (2001). Environmental Policy in the European Union. The European Series. Palgrave. [in English].
13. Medvid, L., Hovda, H. (2013). Classification of costs of hunting farms as a methodological basis for the organization of their accounting and control. Accounting and auditing, 11, 15-26. [in Ukraine].
14. Muraviov, Yu. V. (2019). Research of costs and sources of income from hunting in Lviv region. Scientific bulletin of NLTU of Ukraine, 29(4), 50–52. [in Ukraine].
15. Myronenko, M.O., Sheremet, I.M., Protsiv, O.R., Bashta, A.-T., Delehan, I.V., Vovchenko, V.Iu., Stankevych-Volosianchuk, O.I., Burmas, V.R., Novikov, R.I., Karabchuk, D.Iu. (2015). Draft model of reforming and developing the hunting economy of Ukraine. http://www.fleg.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Proekt-modeli-reformuvannya-i-rozvytku-myslyvskogo-gospodarstva-Ukrayiny.pdf [in Ukraine].
16. Niemeijer, D., Groot, de R. (2008). A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets. Ecological Indicators, 8, 14-25. [in English].
17. Oliinychuk, O.I. (2010). Methods of accounting for costs of manufacturing products of the forest industry and its improvement. Scientific Bulletin of NLTU of Ukraine, 20(1), 231–238. [in Ukraine].
18. Panova, I. (2019). Conceptual framework for the ecologization of economic system. The scientific heritage, 32, 2, 23-27. [in Ukraine].
19. Safonova, O. N. (2015). Efficiency of the institutes of ecological and economic system. Methods of the solution of environmental problems: Environmental challenges and economic opportunities. Sumy: Publishing house LTD. [in Ukraine].
20. Solow, R. (1974). The Economics of Resources or the Resources of Economics. The American Economic Review, 64(2), 1-14. [in English].
21. Snowdon, P., Harou, P. (2013). Guide to Economic Appraisal of Forestry Investments and Programmers in Europe. Publisher: European Forest Institute. https://efi.int/sites/default/files/files/publication-bank/2018/tr_94.pdf [in English].
22. The concept of reforming and developing the hunting industry for 2020-2030. The concept of reform and development of the hunting industry for 2020-2030, Kyiv: GS “All-Ukrainian Hunting Union”. http://gsvms.org.ua/uk/katehorii/statti/item/307-kontseptsiia-reformuvannia-ta-rozvytku-myslyvskoho-hospodarstva [in Ukraine].
23. Trusova, N. (2016). Systemic factors of projected financial potential of business entities. Economic annals – XXI, 161(9-10), 61-65. [in English].
24. Trusova, N.V., Hryvkivska, O.V., Kotvytska, N.M., Nesterenko, S.A., Yavorska, T.I. & Kotyk, O.V. (2021). Determinants of the innovative and investment development of agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Extension, 8, 81-100. [in English].
25. Trusova, N.V., Cherniavska, T.A., Kyrylov, Yu.Ye., Hranovska, V.H., Skrypnyk, S.V.& Borovik, L.V. (2021). Ensuring security the movement of foreign direct investment: Ukraine and the EU economic relations. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 9(3), 901-920. [in English].
26. Trusova, N.V., Kalchenko, S.V., Pochernina, N.V., Kravets, O.V. & Hurbyk,Yu.Yu. (2021). Territorial distribution of land resource potential of agricultural use in world countries. Regional Science Inquiry, 13(2), 257-276. [in English].