| JEL Classification: M31, D91, Q18, Q56. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31521/modecon.V58(2026)-04 |
Burkovska Anna, PhD (Economics), Associate Professor of the Department of Management, Business and Administration, Mykolayiv National Agrarian University, Mykolayiv, Ukraine
ORCID: 0000-0003-0563-6967
e-mail: anna.burkovskaya12@gmail.com
Cognitive Fit Theory in Marketing Communications: an Innovative Dimension of Food Security and Sustainable Development
Abstract. Introduction. The escalation of global food security challenges caused by climate change, resource constraints, and shifting consumer expectations requires a rethinking of traditional approaches to marketing communications in the agricultural sector. Under these conditions, marketing increasingly performs not only a promotional function but also serves as an instrument for building societal trust in the food system as a whole. However, consumers with a degree of distrust perceive a considerable share of sustainability-focused marketing narratives used by food producers. This underscores the need for a theoretical understanding of cognitive fit as a mechanism capable of explaining and predicting the effectiveness of marketing communications.
Purpose. The purpose of the article is to reveal the theoretical essence of cognitive fit as a conceptual basis for designing marketing communications in the agricultural sector and to substantiate its innovative potential for addressing the challenges of food security and sustainable development.
Results. The essence of cognitive fit theory has been disclosed as a state of consistency between the values declared by a producer, the objective characteristics of a product, and value orientations of the target consumer audience; violation of this consistency generates cognitive dissonance, manifested in declining brand trust and growing skepticism toward sustainability claims. A conceptual model for designing marketing communications on the basis of cognitive fit has been proposed, comprising four blocks: diagnostic (analysis of the target audience’s cognitive schemas), narrative alignment (matching the message to actual product characteristics), communication (selecting channels and formats suited to audience cognition), and fit monitoring (assessing consumer trust and loyalty as indicators of achieved cognitive fit).
Conclusions. Cognitive fit theory constitutes a productive methodological basis for analyzing and designing marketing communications in the agricultural sector. Its application makes it possible to explain the mechanisms underlying consumer trust in sustainability narratives, to identify sources of cognitive dissonance, and to develop practical recommendations for improving the effectiveness of marketing activities of agricultural enterprises. Further research should focus on developing empirical tools for assessing the level of cognitive fit in marketing communications and its impact on food security indicators at the regional and national levels.
Keywords: cognitive fit, marketing communications, food security, sustainable development, consumer perception, sustainability narratives
References:
- Baishakhy, S. D., Rahmani, D., Kallas, Z., & Gil, J. M. (2026). Mapping the consumer mind: a novel multidimensional behavioural model delineating purchase intentions for geographical indication certified agri-foods. Agricultural and Food Economics, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-026-00476-9.
- Burkovska A. (2026). Mathematical Modeling of the Probability of Chicken Meat Purchase Based on Narrative Semantics Theory. Modern Economics, 56(2026), 48-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31521/modecon.V56(2026)-07.
- Burkovska, A. (2026). How sustainability narratives shape consumer perception: a semantic study of chicken meat marketing. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 12(2), 47–82. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2026.12.02.03.
- Dong, X., Chen, S., Guo, D., Wu, Q., Hau, C. Y., & Hui, T. Y. (2026). Consumer Awareness on Sustainable Seafood in Hong Kong’s Supermarkets: Current Status and Potential Drivers. Sustainability, 18(5), 2642. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18052642.
- Malheiros, B. A., Spers, E. E., Castillo, C. J. C., Aroeira, C. N., Lima, L. M. (2025). The role of visual attention and quality cues in consumer purchase decisions for fresh and cooked beef: an Eye-Tracking study. Applied Sciences, 15(13), 7360. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137360.
- Rehman, N., Azhar, A., Jamshed, S., Javaid, U., & Palazzo, M. (2026). The emotional algorithm: nostalgia, artificial intelligence and buying intentions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-04-2025-0508.
- Kuo, Y.-F., Lin, W.-C., Liao, J.-Z., & Liu, H.-H. (2026). Holiday marketing of retailers on social media: impact of post appeals and humor on advertising communication effectiveness. European Journal of Marketing, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-02-2025-0103.
- Szymkowiak, A., Antoniak, M. A., & Konuk, F. A. (2026). When green claims backfire: How consumer distrust fuels boycotts against greenwashers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 93, 104946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2026.104946.
- Vig, S., & Tewary, T. (2026). Eco-consciousness and self-image congruence as predictors of circular purchase intention among young Indian consumers. Discover Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-03043-w.
- Bağış, M., Kucukaltan, B., Yolcu, T., Kurutkan, M. N., & Ardıç, K. (2026). Microfoundations of supply chain agility: managerial attention, cognitive styles and sustainable marketing. Management Decision, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-05-2025-1184.
- Alipour, P., Gallegos, E. E., & Sridhar, S. (2026). Analyzing consumer behavior during virtual reality product exploration in e-commerce. Journal of Business Research, 211, 116196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116196.
Received: 5 August 2026
|
How to quote this article? |
| Burkovska A. (2026). Cognitive Fit Theory in Marketing Communications: an Innovative Dimension of Food Security and Sustainable Development. Modern Economics, 58(2026), 28-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31521/modecon.V58(2026)-04. |








Українська