Vasylenko Liudmyla, Postgraduate Student, NSC “Institute of Agrarian Economics”, Kyiv, Ukraine

Efficiency of application of crop protection chemicals in agriculture

Introduction. The current development of agricultural production is impossible without agrarian intensification. It means the solution to the problem of crop protection against diseases, pests, and weeds. Domestic and foreign experience proves agriculture loses about thirty percent of harvest if pesticides are not applied. Thus, it is very important to study the efficiency of the application of pesticides in agriculture.

Purpose. To reveal specific features of estimation of efficiency of crop protection chemical application in agriculture. To research their economic efficiency under contemporary circumstances.

Results. Application of crop protection chemicals has positive results as well as negative ones. Positive results mean the increase in crop yield and profitability. Negative results concern the environment, people, and animals.  Consequently, they have to be taken into account when the economic efficiency of pesticides is estimated. Calculation of economic efficiency of pesticides in Ukraine’s agriculture is given. So, on average, in 2016 application of pesticides in agriculture gave high benefits. The level of profitability was 434 percent.

Conclusions. Estimation of the efficiency of crop protection chemical application is a complicated task, which must study various aspects and effects. Application of pesticides embraces different spheres including economy, ecology, and a social sphere. Our research has shown their high efficiency even under unsuitable economic conditions. As a result, their application should be expanded as one of the efficient ways to increase agricultural production and satisfy demand for food.

Keywords: crop protection chemicals; economic efficiency; agriculture; effect; profitability.

References

1. Vyhera, S. M. (2015). Pryrodookhoronnyi kontrol kulturnykh fitotsenoziv [Environmental control of cultural phytocoenoses], Komprynt, Kiev, Ukraine.
2. Dovhan, S. V. (2009). Modeli prohnozuvannia ta rozmnozhennia fitofahiv [Models of prediction and reproduction of phytophages], Ailant, Kherson, Ukraine.
3. Krut, M. V. (2014). “Environmental orientation of innovations of the Institute of Plant Protection of NAAS”, Zakhyst i karantyn roslyn, vol. 6, pp. 184-190.
4. Pysarenko, V. M. and Pysarenko, P. V. (2002). Zakhyst roslyn: ekolohichno obgruntovani systemy [Plant protection: environmentally sound systems], Inter Hrafika, Poltava, Ukraine.
5. Fedorenko, V. P. and Hetman, S. V. (2009). “Topical issues of crop protection”, Zakhyst roslyn, Karantyn, vol.3, pp. 1-5.
6. Fokin, A. V. (2009). “Some world trends in plant protection”, Hazeta po-ukrainsky, vol.9, pp. 9-12.
7. Shevchuk, I. V. (2003). Suchasni metody zakhystu plodovo-yahidnykh i ovochevykh kultur vid shkidlyvykh orhanizmiv [Modern methods of protection of fruit and berry and vegetable crops from harmful organisms], Rarytet, Kyiv, Ukraine.
8. Cherven, I. I. and Apostolova, T. V. (2004). “Methodological aspects of evaluation and the current state of economic efficiency of the functioning of agrochemical formations”, Ekonomika APK, vol. 4, pp. 57-60.
9. Korchynska, O. A. (2015). Orhanizatsiino-ekonomichne rehuliuvannia rozshyrenoho vidtvorennia rodiuchosti gruntiv [Organizational and economic regulation of the extended fertility reproduction of soils], NNTs „IAE”, Kyiv, Ukraine.
10. Khodakivska, O. V. Korchynska, S. H. Chelombitko, A. F. and Chekan, K. V. (2017). “Use of plant protection products in agriculture”, Ekonomika APK, vol. 1, pp. 24-30.
11. Economic and energy efficiency of integrated plant protection [Online], retrived from: https://studref.com/348768/agropromyshlennost/ekonomicheskaya_energeticheskaya_effektivnost_integrirovannoy_zaschity_rasteniy (Accessed 01 October 2018).

Received: 16 October 2018

vasylenko.pdf

Size: 0.38 Mb

Download Now!1999 Downloads