Zholos T., PhD student, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine

ORCID ID: 0000-0003-3839-0991
e-mail: taras.zholos@gmail.com

Mazurenko V., Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine

ORCID ID: 0000-0002-7167-215X
e-mail: mvi1210@ukr.net

Estimating the Business Cycle of Ukraine Under the Conditions of Large External Compound Shocks

Abstract. Introduction. Conventional business cycle estimation methods typically rely on the assumption that the shocks to an economy are normally distributed. However, global social and political instability can result in external shocks that are more severe than purely economic shocks, thus hampering the ability of these estimation methods to separate cyclical behavior from long-run dynamics. Since effective economic policy is dependent upon the ability to make accurate forecasts, an understanding of the properties of business cycle estimation methods in the presence of large shocks in the data is of first order importance.

Purpose. The purpose of this article was to compare the ability of various business cycle estimation methods — and in particular detrending filters — to account for large external compound shocks (i.e. those containing both economic and non-economic components) when extracting the cyclical component of the real GDP series of Ukraine. In view of Ukraine’s policy of European integration, a secondary goal was to investigate the performance of various detrending filters in deriving a measure of business cycle co-movement of Ukraine vis-à-vis the EU that is robust to external compound shocks.

Results. Using an unobserved components model with external geopolitical shocks as a benchmark, it was found that the application of the boosted Hodrick-Prescott filter, the Christiano-Fitzgerald filter, and the Hamilton regression filter to the real GDP data of Ukraine produced cyclical components that exhibited spurious dynamics, particularly from 2020 and onward.

Conclusions. It was shown that no single business cycle estimation method performed the best in application to the real GDP series of Ukraine. While the unobserved components model relied on extensive researcher-specified assumptions and an ad hoc approach to identifying external compound shocks, the use of data filtering resulted in series that did not accurately reflect cyclical and trend dynamics in Ukraine toward the end of the sample. Thus, there is a practical need to develop new business cycle estimation models that would be able to account for the distorting influence of large external compound shocks.

Keywords: business cycles; external shocks, unobserved components model; detrending filters; business cycle co-movement; European integration.

References:

1. Utlaut, J. & van Roye, B. (2010). The effects of external shocks on business cycles in emerging asia: A Bayesian VAR model. IFW Kiel, Institute for the World Economy, Kiel Working Papers, 1668. Retrieved from : https://www.ifw-kiel.de/publications/kiel-working-papers/pre2021/the-effects-of-external-shocks-on-business-cycles-in-emerging-asia-a-bayesian-var-model-7418 [in English].
2. Canova, F. (1998). Detrending and business cycle facts. Journal of Monetary Economics. 41. 475-512. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3932(98)00006-3. Retrieved from : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304393298000063 [in English].
3. Larsson, G. & Vasi, T. (2012). Comparison of detrending methods. Retrieved from : https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:531810/FULLTEXT02 [in English].
4. Luvsannyam, D., Batmunkh, K. & Buyankhishig K. (2019). Dating the business cycle: Evidence from Mongolia. Central Bank Review. 19(2). 59-66. Retrieved from : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1303070119300666?via%3Dihub [in English].
5. Paramaguru, K. (2021). A сomparison of business cycle extraction methods: Application to the UK. Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE) Discussion Papers. ESCoE DP-2021-19. Retrieved from : https://ideas.repec.org/p/nsr/escoed/escoe-dp-2021-19.html [in English].
6. Bhowmik, D. (2020). Trends, cycles and seasonal variations of Ukrainian gross domestic product. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks. 4(3). 80-94. Retrieved from: https://armgpublishing.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/8.pdf [in English].
7. Phillips, P. C. B. & Shi, Z. (2021). Boosting: why you can use the HP filter. International Economic Review. 62. 521-570. Retrieved from : https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.00175.pdf [in English].
8. Mei, Z., Phillips, P. C. B. & Shi Z. The boosted HP filter is more general than you might think. Retrieved from : https://ssrn.com/abstract=4224809 [in English].
9. Christiano, L. J. & Fitzgerald, T. J. (2003). The band pass filter. International Economic Review, 44(2), 435–465. Retrieved from : http://www.jstor.org/stable/3663474 [in English].
10. Burns, A. & Mitchell, W. C. (1946). Measuring business cycles. Cambridge (USA): National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from : https://www.nber.org/books-and-chapters/measuring-business-cycles [in English].
11. Hamilton, J. (2018). Why you should never use the Hodrick-Prescott filter. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 100(5). 831–843. Retrieved from : https://direct.mit.edu/rest/article-abstract/100/5/831/58479/Why-You-Should-Never-Use-the-Hodrick-Prescott?redirectedFrom=fulltext [in English].
12. Hodrick, R. (2020). An exploration of trend-cycle decomposition methodologies in simulated data. NBER working paper series, Working Paper 26750. Retrieved from : https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26750/w26750.pdf [in English].
13. Harvey, A. C. & Jaeger, A. (1993), Detrending, stylized facts and the business cycle. Journal of Applied Economics, 8, 231-247. Retrieved from : https://www.jstor.org/stable/2284917 [in English].
14. Data Catalog. Global Economic Monitor. The World Bank. Dataset v.3. Retrieved from : https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/search/dataset/0037798/Global-Economic-Monitor [in English].
15. Ministry of Economy of Ukraine: GDP overall fell by 29.2% in 2022. Ministry of Economy Informational Resources. Retrieved from : https://www.me.gov.ua/News/Detail?lang=uk-UA&id=b30e854d-b47d-4806-82ac-bb6daa87fa51&title=Minekonomiki [in English].
16. Harding, D. & Pagan, A. (2002). Dissecting the cycle: a methodological investigation. Journal of Monetary Economics. 49(2). 365-381. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304393201001088?via%3Dihub [in English].
17. Data and Code. National Centre for Econometric Research. Retrieved from: https://www.ncer.edu.au/resources/data-and-code.php [in English].
18. Chang, Y. & Hwang, S. (2015). Asymmetric phase shifts in U.S. industrial production cycles. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 97(1). 116–133. Retrieved from : https://direct.mit.edu/rest/article-abstract/97/1/116/58209/Asymmetric-Phase-Shifts-in-U-S-Industrial?redirectedFrom=fulltext [in English].
19. Alichi, A. (2015). A new methodology for estimating the output gap in the United States. International Monetary Fund (IMF) Working Papers. Working Paper No. 2015/144. Retrieved from : https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/31/A-New-Methodology-for-Estimating-the-Output-Gap-in-the-United-States-43040 [in English].
20. Steehouwer, H. & Lee, K. M. (2011). A zero phase shift band pass filter. Retrieved from: https://www.suomenpankki.fi/globalassets/en/research/seminars-and-conferences/conferences-and-workshops/documents/fdr2011/fdr2011_steehouwerlee_paper.pdf [in English].
21. Baxter, M. & King, R. G. (1999). Measuring business cycles : Approximate band-pass filters for economic time series. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 81(4). 575–593. Retrieved from : https://direct.mit.edu/rest/article-abstract/81/4/575/57162/Measuring-Business-Cycles-Approximate-Band-Pass?redirectedFrom=fulltext [in English].