Litvinov Oleksandr, Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor of the Department of Enterprises Economic and Organization of Entrepreneurial Activity, Odessa National Economic University, Odesa, Ukraine

ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1424-6904
e-mail: litvinov_a213@ukr.net

Managerial Decision Making on the Development of Intellectual Capital of an Enterprise

Abstract. Introduction. Despite the crucial importance of intangible components in the activities of modern enterprises there is an increasing the urgency of the problem of development of methodical tools for making managerial decisions aimed at the development of intellectual capital. Herewith managerial decision-making procedure should include task setting, intellectual capital diagnostics, and formation of a set of possible and optimal management measures.

Purpose. The article is devoted to the technology of managerial decision making on the development of intellectual capital, taking into account the requirements of their economic efficiency, and paretooptimality. Practical approbation of the proposed procedure on the example of domestic industrial enterprises is a separate task of the article.

Results. The results of a comprehensive analysis of the internal and external environment of the enterprise, the analysis of the efficiency of intellectual capital reproduction were taken into account. The author`s technology of managerial decision-making on the development of intellectual capital development includes 6 stages. The first stage forms target marks and budget constraints that determine direction of managerial decisions for each of the components of intellectual capital. In the third stage a number of possible management decisions is formed, which is then checked for paretooptimality. In the fifth stage, optimal managerial decisions are selected in terms of investment intensity of increasing in the level of intellectual capital development. At the last stage, the degree of achieving management targets is checked, than, if necessary, changes are made.

Conclusions. Developed technology provides consideration of the peculiarities of the internal and external environment, targets and investment opportunities of an enterprise, and also allows paretooptimal and effective managerial decision making.

Keywords: managerial decision making; intellectual capital; paretooptimality; development of intellectual capital; economic efficiency; human capital.

References:

1. Litvinov, O. (2018). The concept of intellectual capital. Modern Economics, 11, 98-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31521/modecon.V11(2018)-16 [in Ukrainian].
2. Stewart, T. A. (1991). Brain Power: How Intellectual Capital Is Becoming America’s Most Valuable Asset. Fortune, June 3, 44-60.
3. Brooking, A. (1996). Intellectual Capital: Core Asset for the Third Millennium Enterprise. London: Thomson Business Press, 224.
4. Edvinsson, L. (2001). Intellectual Capital: Realizing your Company’s True Value by Finding its Hidden Brainpower. New York: Harper Business,
5. Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: Management, Measurement and Reporting. Washington: The Brookings Institution, 231.
6. Kendjukhov, O. V. (2008). Efektyvne upravlinnja intelektualjnym kapitalom. [Effective management of intellectual capital], Donecjk : DonUEP, [in Ukrainian]
7. Khilukha, O., Kuzjmin, O. & Lipych, L. (2014). Upravlinnja intelektualjnym kapitalom mashynobudivnykh pidpryjemstv: teoretychni ta prykladni polozhennja [Management of intellectual capital of machine-building enterprises: theoretical and applied provisions], Lucjk : Vezha-Druk, [in Ukrainian]
8. Sobko, O. M. (2014). Intelektualjnyj kapital pidpryjemstva : konceptualizacija–funkcionuvannja–rozvytok [Intellectual capital of the enterprise: conceptualization – functioning – development], Ternopilj : Krok, 360. [in Ukrainian]
9. Dumay, J. (2016). A critical reflection on the future of intellectual capital: from reporting to disclosure. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17 (1), 168-184.
10. Litvinov, O. S. (2019). Intelektualjnyj kapital pidpryjemstva: sutnistj, ocinka, rozvytok [Intellectual capital of the enterprise: essence, evaluation, development], Odesa : Astroprynt, 392. [in Ukrainian]
11. Simon, H. A. (1987). Making management decisions: The role of intuition and emotion. Academy of Management Perspectives, 1 (1), 57-64.
12. Cristofaro, M. (2019). The role of affect in management decisions: A systematic review. European Management Journal, 37(1), 6-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.12.002
13. Martinez-Harms, M. J., Bryan, B. A., Balvanera, P., Law, E. A., Rhodes, J. R., Possingham, H. P. & Wilson, K. A. (2015). Making decisions for managing ecosystem services. Biological Conservation, 184, 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.024
14. Kvyatkovskaya, I. Y., Shurshev, V. F. & Frenkel, M. B. (2015). Methodology of a support of making management decisions for poorly structured problems. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 535, 278-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23766-4_23
15. Anderson, D. R., Sweeney, D. J. & Williams, T. A. (2005). An Introduction to Management Science: Quantitative Approaches to Decision Making, Ohio: South-Western, 39.
16. Saaty Thomas, L. (2008). Decision Making with Dependencies and Feedbacks: Analytical Networks. Moscow: Publ. house “LKI”, 360.
17. Zaitsev, D. V., Evtyukov, S. S., Karelina, E. A., Voropaev, V. V. & Kholodova, A. O. (2020, April). Methodology for making management decisions in digital economy systems. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 832, 1, https://doi:10.1088/1757-899X/832/1/012073
18. Chernorutsky, I. G. (2005). Methods of decision making. Saint-Petersburg, BHV-Petersburg, 416.
19. Kuznecova, I. & Sokurenko, I. (2019). Technology of management decision making. Naukovyj visnyk, 5 (268), 169. [in Ukrainian]
20. Popova, D. A. (2018). Development of an algorithm for making management decisions based on situational analysis. Juvenis scientia, 12, 20-22. https://DOI: 10.32415/jscientia.2018.12.05
21. Litvinov, O. & Nefedova, T. (2019). Marketing as the source of establishment of pillars of the enterprise intellectual capital. Marketyngh i cyfrovi tekhnologhiji, 3, 16-24