| JEL Classification: O18; R11; H53; I38 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31521/modecon.V56(2026)-41 |
Shandova Nataliia, Doctor of Economics, Professor, The Head of the Department of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Economic Security, Kherson National Technical University, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine
ORCID: 0000-0002-6278-1143
e-mail: shandova.nataliya@kntu.edu.ua
Oliinyk Nataliia, PhD (Engineering), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Economic Security, Kherson National Technical University, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine
ORCID: 0000-0002-1019-5708
e-mail: oliynyk.nataliya@kntu.edu.ua
Borovik Liubov, Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Economic Security, Kherson National Technical University, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine
ORCID: 0000-0001-7200-0497
e-mail: borovik.liubov@kntu.edu.ua
Tarasyuk Alla, PhD (Economics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Economic Security, Kherson National Technical University, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine
ORCID: 0000-0001-7765-502X
e-mail: tarasyuk.ala@kntu.edu.ua
Social Investment in the System of Ensuring Economic Security and Development of Post-Conflict Regions
Abstract. Introduction. The article examines the theoretical and methodological foundations of social investment as a strategic instrument for ensuring economic security and sustainable recovery of territories affected by armed conflicts. The relevance of the study is conditioned by the critical vulnerability of post-conflict regions, large-scale destruction of social infrastructure, deep labour market deformation, and the urgent need to transition from passive humanitarian aid distribution to proactive mechanisms for building long-term economic resilience.
Purpose. The study aims to substantiate the adaptive-security function of social investments, determine their systemic role in restoring and modernizing regional economies, and develop a toolkit for their practical implementation.
Results. The findings indicate that social investment should be viewed not as current consumptive expenditure but as a catalyst for long-term economic potential and a driver of structural changes. Five interconnected components of the adaptive-security function are identified: preventive, stabilizing, adaptive, institutional, and transformative. A functional classification of social investments, differentiated by time horizon and targeted impact on the security environment, is developed. A conceptual model of the cascading transformation of investment resources into economic security is constructed, featuring a positive feedback loop – the «resilience spiral». Key implementation risk groups (managerial, economic, social, institutional) are identified with mitigation measures, and an indicator system for empirical model verification is formulated.
Conclusions. The results can be applied by state and local authorities in developing comprehensive post-war recovery strategies, optimizing international assistance programs, enhancing public-private partnership mechanisms, and by scholars and analytical centers for monitoring the effectiveness of socially oriented investment programs at the regional level.
Keywords: social investment, economic security, post-conflict regions, adaptive-security function, economic resilience, social capital, regional development, resilience.
References:
- Midgley, J. (2017). Social investment: Concepts, uses and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of Social Investment. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785338168.00007.
- Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie, D., Hemerijk, A., & Myers, J. (2002). Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hemerijck, A., Ronchi, S., & Plavgo, I. (2022). Social investment as a conceptual framework for analysing well-being returns and reforms in 21st century welfare states. Socio-Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwac035.
- Garritzmann, J., Häusermann, S., & Palier, B. (2025). Social investment – A (mis)leading paradigm? Why we need to distinguish different types of social investments. Acta Sociologica. https://doi.org/10.1177/00016993251369992.
- Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
- Lomachynska, I. A., & Suprunenko, M. D. (2023). Formuvannia kontseptu sotsialnoho investuvannia u konteksti suchasnykh hlobalnykh vyklykiv. Rynkova ekonomika: suchasna teoriia i praktyka upravlinnia, 22(2(54), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.18524/2413-9998.2023.2(54).297696.
- Herasymenko, T. (2023). Vplyv sotsialnoho investuvannia biznesu na rozvytok suspilstva: implementatsiia mizhnarodnoho dosvidu v Ukraini. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, (55). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-55-102.
- Kot, L. (2025). Sotsialne pidpryiemnytstvo yak instrument pidvyshchennia ekonomichnoi bezpeky derzhavy. Stalyi rozvytok ekonomiky, (5 (56)), 388-396. https://doi.org/10.32782/2308-1988/2025-56-53.
- Zablodska, I. V., Tiazhkorob, I. V., & Sieriebriak, K. I. (2019). Strategic aspect of social investment in the context of regional development. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 4(31), 487-496. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v4i31.191002.
- Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations (2015). https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
- Hemerijck, A. (2013) Changing Welfare States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Filipenko, A.S., Rohach, O.I., & Shnyrkov, O.I. (2001). Svitova ekonomika: pidruchnyk. Kyiv : Lybid.
- Yatsenko L. (2024). Osnovni kharakterystyky rynku pratsi Ukrainy u pershomu pivrichchi 2024 roku. NISD. https://niss.gov.ua/doslidzhennya/sotsialna-polityka/osnovni-kharakterystyky-rynku-pratsi-ukrayiny-u-pershomu.
- Vidnovlennia ta rekonstruktsiia povoiennoi ekonomiky Ukrainy. (2022). NAN Ukrainy, DU «In-t ekon. ta prohnozuv. NAN Ukrainy».
- Bazyliuk, Ya. B., & etc. (2024). Ekonomichna bezpeka Ukrainy v umovakh dovhotryvaloi viiny. NISD. https://doi.org/10.53679/niss-analytrep.2024.08.
- International Labour Organization (2020). World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2020. Geneva: ILO.
- Becker, G. S. (1993). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- World Development Report 2011: Conflict, Security, and Development. (2011). The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8439-8.
- Melnyk, M. (Red.). (2024). Rezylientnist endohennoho rozvytku rehioniv v umovakh hlobalnykh vyklykiv ta shokiv. NAN Ukrainy. DU «Instytut rehionalnykh doslidzhen imeni M. I. Dolishnoho NAN Ukrainy».
- Rodrik, D. (2008). One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton University Press.
- Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.
Received: 13 April 2026

|
How to quote this article? |
| Shandova N., Oliinyk N., Borovik L., Tarasyuk A. (2026). “Social Investment in the System of Ensuring Economic Security and Development of Post-Conflict Regions”. Modern Economics, 56(2026), 287-298.DOI: https://doi.org/10.31521/modecon.V56(2026)-41. |







Українська